A public exchange between Manchester United defender Lisandro Martinez and two iconic former players, Nicky Butt and Paul Scholes, has highlighted the complex and sometimes uneasy relationship between the club’s current squad and its legendary “Class of 92”.
The debate began on The Good, The Bad, The Football podcast, where Butt and Scholes had jokingly suggested that Manchester City striker Erling Haaland might physically overpower the relatively short Martinez in the Manchester derby. While the comments were made in a light-hearted tone, Martinez appeared to take them personally. After United’s impressive 2-0 victory over City at Old Trafford, the Argentine defender responded by suggesting that critics are brave behind television cameras but far quieter when confronted face to face.
Following the match, Butt and Scholes revisited the subject on the same podcast, this time striking a more reflective tone. Both praised Martinez’s performance against Haaland, acknowledging the difficulty of the task and giving credit where it was due. Butt in particular highlighted that Martinez had gone “man-to-man with the best centre forward in the world” and emerged successfully, calling his display “brilliant”.
However, Butt also questioned Martinez’s reaction to the original comments. He suggested that players at a club the size of Manchester United need thicker skin and the ability to rise above criticism, especially when it comes from pundits or former players. In Butt’s view, becoming emotional over jokes or opinions expressed on a podcast risks distracting from on-pitch responsibilities. Scholes echoed similar sentiments, revealing that Martinez had previously contacted him privately on social media to express disappointment over remarks made in the media.
This episode is more than just a minor disagreement. It offers a snapshot of the ongoing tension between United’s modern-day players and the influential voices of the club’s past. The Class of 92—Ryan Giggs, Paul Scholes, David Beckham, Nicky Butt, and brothers Gary and Phil Neville—are not just former players. Between them, they made over 3,400 appearances for Manchester United and formed the backbone of Sir Alex Ferguson’s legendary Treble-winning side in 1999.
Their connection to the club has never truly faded. Several members of the group have worked in coaching or executive roles at Old Trafford. Giggs served as interim manager and later as assistant manager, while Butt worked extensively within the academy system, eventually becoming head of youth development. Few individuals are more closely associated with United’s tradition of nurturing young talent.
Butt’s passion for youth development remains clear. Even after leaving his official role, he has continued to support initiatives linked to the club’s heritage, including coaching underprivileged children through Sir Bobby Charlton’s Foundation. Yet his outspoken views have occasionally put him at odds with the club’s hierarchy, particularly around the balance between winning and long-term player development.
The Class of 92 are also deeply embedded in the football media landscape. Through television punditry, podcasts, and public speaking, their opinions reach millions of fans every week. Gary Neville, in particular, has become one of the most recognisable voices in football analysis, rarely holding back when assessing United’s performances or direction.
This constant scrutiny can create friction. Former United coach Ruben Amorim once suggested that voices like Neville’s carried too much influence within the club, a claim that sparked debate. While some see the Class of 92 as constructive critics who care deeply about United’s success, others feel their commentary can place additional pressure on players and managers already under intense scrutiny.
Despite this, senior figures at Manchester United have been keen to stress that the relationship remains strong. The club’s partnership with UA92, the university founded by members of the Class of 92, is evidence of ongoing cooperation and mutual respect. United officials have described these former players as part of the club’s extended family, whose opinions—positive or negative—come from a place of loyalty rather than hostility.
Gary Neville himself has dismissed suggestions of a rift, insisting that the group is “desperate for the club to succeed” and that frustration after defeats is only natural. From his perspective, criticism is not an attack but a reflection of high standards forged during one of the most successful eras in United’s history.
Yet Martinez’s reaction shows that not all players are comfortable ignoring commentary from club legends. In the modern game, where social media amplifies every opinion and reaction, players are more exposed than ever. What might once have been brushed aside can now feel personal, particularly when it comes from figures whose achievements command respect.
Scholes summed up the situation by suggesting that engagement with criticism can sometimes make matters worse. Having shared his phone number with Martinez after a private exchange, he noted that no further conversation followed. For Scholes and Butt, the message was clear: players must learn to separate opinion from personal attack if they want to thrive at the highest level.
Ultimately, this episode underlines a broader truth about Manchester United. The club’s history is both a blessing and a burden. The legends of the past set standards that continue to shape expectations today, while current players must navigate scrutiny not just from fans and media, but from those who once defined success at Old Trafford.
As United continue their rebuild, balancing respect for their heritage with support for the present squad will remain a delicate task. Whether players choose to ignore the noise or engage with it, the voices of the Class of 92 are unlikely to fade anytime soon.
For more football news, analysis, and exclusive updates, visit https://netsports247.com
